• 212-827-4501

Coffey Modica Expands New York Legal Team with Three Strategic Hires

Coffey Modica Announces New Partner and Counsel Hires in New York
February 6, 2026

Coffey Modica LLP, a leading defense litigation firm representing businesses and insurance companies in liability claims, excess property and casualty, medical malpractice, and other professional industries, is pleased to announce three new additions to their New York team. Partner Raychel Camilleri will practice out of the firm’s Tarrytown office while Josue Dorleus and Nicholas MacInnis will join the Manhattan office as Counsel.

“Since our firm’s inception in 2021, I have had the privilege of seeing the exceptional development and expansion of Coffey Modica’s legal teams and the diversification of legal experience and knowledge from our practitioners,” said New York Managing Partner Patricia Mooney, who oversees Coffey Modica’s four offices across the State. “These three talented attorneys will no doubt contribute to Coffey Modica’s dynamic and client-driven team by bringing their unique experiences and legal insights to their new positions.”

Camilleri is a seasoned trial attorney with over a decade of experience representing real estate developers, owners, general contractors, design professionals, and insurers. She focuses her practice on commercial litigation, construction law, and general liability defense, including defense of complex construction and New York Labor Law claims, products liability, premises liability, and transportation matters. She has tried more than two dozen jury trials to verdict in courts across New York City, the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York, and throughout Westchester, Orange, Ulster, and Nassau Counties. She also conducted several bench trials, arbitrations before the American Arbitration Association, and mediations with vendors and industry stakeholders.

“Coffey Modica is not only one of the fastest growing, but is also one of the most innovative defense litigation law firms, helping to create a new standard in the legal industry by utilizing advanced technology and methods that enable attorneys to focus more on practicing than administrative tasks,” said Camilleri. “I am confident that the work this dynamic team and I are doing will deliver quality results to our clients.”

Before joining Coffey Modica, Camilleri practiced at prominent real estate and civil litigation law firms in New York City. She also served as counsel to major insurers, defending a broad range of bodily injury and coverage cases. She earned her J.D. at Western New England University School of Law after obtaining her B.A. from Bucknell University.

Coffey Modica also added two attorneys to their Manhattan office. Josue Dorleus and Nicholas MacInnis will both serve in the role of Counsel at the firm’s new Wall Street office, which recently doubled their Manhattan presence by taking a full floor in the Bankers Trust Building.

Dorleus works within the firm’s general liability and construction litigation practice groups. He honed his courtroom and trial preparation skills while prosecuting abuse and negligence cases on behalf of the New York City Administration for Children’s Services (ACS) before taking on roles at several prominent law firms in both New York and Texas, where he represented a wide range of clients, including national banks, fintech, and auto financing companies. Beyond his years as a litigator, Dorleus also previously served as Assistant General Counsel to a real estate investment and property management group.  He is a graduate of Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University.

MacInnis focuses his practice on construction accident, labor law, and high-exposure premises liability, representing owners, general contractors, and other corporate defendants. Admitted to practice in both New York and Massachusetts, MacInnis brings significant appellate experience, having drafted and argued appeals before multiple departments of New York State Appellate Division and serving as an Appellate Panel Attorney for the Massachusetts Committee for Public Counsel Services. He earned his J.D. from Suffolk Law School after attending Bates College for his bachelor’s degree.

Founded in 2021, Coffey Modica is one of the fastest growing law firms in the nation with offices in New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Georgia, and Florida. Coffey Modica LLP represents defendants in high-profile, high exposure matters across many disciplines and industries around the country. Known for being aggressive trial attorneys and litigators, Coffey Modica resolves matters on behalf of its clients with the most cost-effective resolutions aligned with their short- and long-term business goals and culture.

# # #

Coffey Modica Promotes Two Partners to Firm Wide Leadership Roles

Appointments Support Continued National Growth of Rapidly Expanding Defense Litigation Firm
January 9, 2026

Coffey Modica LLP, among the fastest growing defense litigation firms in the nation, representing prominent business and insurance companies in liability claims, excess property/casualty, medical malpractice, nursing, and other professional industries, announces that Maxwell Bottini has been named Firmwide Managing Partner and Patricia Mooney as Deputy Managing Partner. Both attorneys have been with the firm since its inception.

Founded in 2021, Coffey Modica has experienced rapid and strategic growth, expanding from one office to now eight offices in New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Georgia, and Florida.

“Since Coffey Modica’s earliest days, Maxwell Bottini and Patricia Mooney have been instrumental in establishing the firm’s foundation and shaping the culture that continues to attract top legal talent and an enviable client roster,” said Michael Coffey, Founding Partner.  “They have proven to not only be formidable trial attorneys but also trusted mentors and leaders. Their modern, forward-thinking approach to leadership will be a tremendous asset as the firm continues its expansion into new markets.”

In his new role, Bottini will continue to maintain an active litigation practice while overseeing operations across all eight offices. Coffey Modica currently employs 78 attorneys and professional staff across five states along the East Coast, and Bottini will play a key role in guiding the firm’s ongoing geographic and strategic growth.

Bottini joined the firm in 2021 before eventually being promoted to partner in 2024. During his tenure at Coffey Modica, Bottini has successfully tried more than 20 cases to verdict, handling complex, high-value matters relating to construction litigation and defects, product liability litigation, transportation, premises liability, domestic and international reinsurance transactions including captive matters, and excess liability and casualty. He began his career as an Assistant District Attorney in the Kings County District Attorney’s Office after obtaining his JD from Brooklyn Law School.

Having been with Coffey Modica since the launch of the firm, it has been so very fulfilling to see the dynamic evolution and growth, from New England to Florida. What uniquely sets Coffey Modica apart in the legal community is its people, innovation, and the drive of our litigation teams that have such a deep client-focused approach to the law,” said Bottini. “I have been able to learn and grow alongside this talented team at Coffey Modica and look forward to this new leadership role.”

Patricia Mooney joined the firm in 2021 before accepting the role of New York Managing Partner in 2025. She is a 20-year veteran of the insurance defense industry with a focus on construction litigation, including high-exposure New York Labor matters, general and premises liability, medical malpractice and nursing home negligence cases. Mooney has litigated cases throughout New York’s Five boroughs, Westchester County, Long Island and in the majority of upstate venues, in both state and federal court.

Over the years, Mooney has gravitated towards more of a legal mentorship role, offering guidance to younger attorneys while overseeing case management across the firm’s New York offices. In this new role, she will be responsible for distributing cases, handling HR concerns and facilitating the professional development resources that help firm attorneys stay on track across all eight offices. She obtained her degree from Pace University Law School.

“It has been a privilege to be here for Coffey Modica’s evolution into a nationally recognized legal organization,” said Mooney. “We have such a talented and dedicated roster of attorneys and staff who continually deliver top results to clients. In this new role, I am excited to further support the development of our people and help attract top legal talent to the firm.”

Founded in 2021, Coffey Modica is one of the fastest growing law firms in the nation with offices in New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Georgia, and Florida. Coffey Modica LLP represents defendants in high-profile, high exposure matters across many disciplines and industries around the country. Known for being aggressive trial attorneys and litigators, Coffey Modica resolves matters on behalf of its clients with the most cost-effective resolutions aligned with their short- and long-term business goals and culture.

###

Coffey Modica Announces New Hires and Promotions at Several New York Offices

August 28, 2025

Coffey Modica LLP, a leading defense litigation firm representing businesses and insurance companies in liability claims, excess property and casualty, medical malpractice, nursing, and other professional industries, is pleased to announce a new litigation partner has joined the firm and will work from its Tarrytown, NY offices.

Partner Colleen E. Hastie is a seasoned litigator with over two decades of experience handling defense of general litigation matters, with a focus on nursing home litigation and construction related cases including construction defect, property damage, and personal injuries arising from Labor Law violations and product liability claims. She has a proven track record of successful outcomes ranging from full dismissal of the case to favorable settlement.

“I had the pleasure of working on several cases with Colleen Hastie in the early days of our careers, and she brings with her a strong courtroom presence and commitment to implementing unique approaches to each case,” said Tarrytown Office Managing Partner Patricia Mooney. “Her client-focused and results driven approach will make her a vital asset to the Coffey Modica team.”

Before joining Coffey Modica, Hastie held leadership roles at law firms across New York, where she successfully represented a wide range of corporate and institutional clients, including nurses in various administrative hearings regarding professional complaints and malpractice.

She is also deeply focused on mentoring the coming generation of legal professionals, teaching a range of Continuing Legal Education (CLE) classes on a variety of subjects related to her experiences in New York general litigation matters.

“Over the course of my career, I’ve had the opportunity to work with several of the attorneys at Coffey Modica and have come to admire both their devotion to client representation and superior level of preparedness in every case,” said Hastie. “The firm has built a collaborative environment where attorneys and staff are approachable at every level, and I look forward to being part of that company culture.”

Hastie will serve clients across New York City and the Hudson Valley. She received her J.D. from Pace University School of Law after obtaining her bachelor’s from the University of Michigan.

“Over the years, I had the opportunity to litigate cases against Colleen Hastie and have always had the greatest respect for her legal acumen and litigation skills,” said Founding Partner Michael Coffey. “At Coffey Modica, we strive to provide a knowledgeable team of attorneys dedicated to creating favorable outcomes for each of our clients, and it is a privilege to have Colleen working beside us.”

Coffey Modica has also promoted two attorneys working with the firm’s New York team. Veronica Mishkind of the Tarrytown office and Amanpreet Dhaliwal of the Manhattan office will both now serve in the role of Counsel.

Mishkind has been a member of the firm’s Medical Malpractice and Professional Liability practice group since 2022. Having received a Bachelor of Science in Nursing from New York University, Mishkind brings a unique understanding of both medicine and law to her role litigating complex high exposure medical malpractice and personal injury cases. Mishkind is a graduate of Brooklyn Law School, as well as a former international competitive ice skater and the creator of “Skate for Charity,” an ice-skating show fundraiser.

“At Coffey Modica, I have had the incredible opportunity to work with and learn from a team of esteemed attorneys in the medical malpractice and professional liability space,” said Mishkind. “Their shared commitment to client-driven results has made the Coffey Modica team stand out among their peers, and I am grateful for the opportunity to continue growing with the firm in this new role.”

Dhaliwal joined Coffey Modica in 2024, where he focuses his practice on construction-related matters, general liability, and complex litigation. He previously worked at several law firms across New York and New Jersey, where he gained expertise in a wide range of practice areas, including insurance litigation, estate planning, matrimonial law, and criminal defense. Dhaliwal is a graduate of Stony Brook University and the Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University.

“Since I first joined the firm last year, the Coffey Modica team has been incredibly supportive, helping me to develop my skills as a litigator tackling complex cases for some of the most dynamic insurers and corporate entities,” said Dhaliwal. “I appreciate the confidence the firm leadership has shown in me with this promotion, and I welcome this opportunity to further evolve alongside one of the best legal teams in the business.”

Founded in 2021, Coffey Modica continues to be one of the fastest growing law firms in the nation with offices in Lower Manhattan, Buffalo, Suffolk County and Tarrytown, NY, as well as Westport, CT and Jersey City, NJ. Coffey Modica LLP represents defendants in high-profile, high exposure matters across many disciplines and industries around the country. Known for being aggressive trial attorneys and litigators, Coffey Modica resolves matters on behalf of its clients with the most cost-effective resolutions aligned with their short- and long-term business goals and culture.

###

Secondary trauma hits attorneys hard; here’s how to navigate it.

Jodi Ritter, a partner at Coffey Modica, shared her personal story from working in the King’s County DA’s office and how she came to pivot her career, finding new opportunities at Coffey Modica.
Danielle Braff | August 12, 2025

Eighty stab wounds and a severe disfigurement convinced Jodi Ritter to rethink her career as an assistant district attorney in Kings County in Brooklyn, New York City. Ritter prosecuted a case in the early 2000s, promising her client a spot in the Witness Protection Program in exchange for her testimony against her abusive husband. But her husband tapped the woman’s phone and learned of the plan.

“He locked her and the kids in the basement and stabbed her about 80 times in her face and neck in front of the kids but didn’t kill her,” Ritter says.

The woman wore a scarf over her face to hide her disfigurement, and when she popped into Ritter’s office, it was a constant reminder of how Ritter had failed her.

“I couldn’t sleep, couldn’t eat and got very sick,” Ritter says.

The stress led to a few rounds of diverticulitis (a gastrointestinal disease), and Ritter had surgery to remove her colon.

This was the final straw for the prosecutor, who realized that her secondary trauma could take her life. She left the district attorney’s office, eventually landing as a partner at Coffey Modica specializing in insurance defense litigation in Tarrytown, New York.

Ritter’s experience sheds light on a lesser-known but profound challenge within the legal profession: secondary trauma. For many attorneys and judges, the emotional toll of handling distressing cases can accumulate, creating lasting psychological impacts.

Balancing act

In a 2003 study of attorneys, mental health providers and social workers, researchers found that lawyers had the most frequent and severe symptoms of this secondary trauma. And a 2021 study examining 10 articles dealing with secondary trauma found that nine of the 10 reported elevated levels of secondary trauma in the legal profession.

“As a prosecutor, you’re supposed to be a strong woman, advocating for the victims,” Ritter says. “You don’t realize that you’re falling apart.”

The numbers alone paint a troubling picture, but personal stories reveal the extent of these struggles more vividly. For David Lever, the founding partner with Lever & Ecker in New York City, a case in 2004 brought him to a breaking point.

The case revolved around a grandmother and her 4-year-old grandson who sustained life-threatening injuries after they were hit by a driver who stole a car and was fleeing from the police.

The grandmother had multiple surgeries, including a leg amputation, and her grandson sustained a coma and a fractured skull with disfiguring facial lacerations.

In addition to the catastrophic injuries, Lever also had to deal with serious challenges trying to prove liability against a police department when there was no proof of physical contact between the police car and the stolen vehicle.

The case was taking such a toll on Lever that his wife ultimately intervened.

“While she was extremely proud of me for my dedication and commitment to represent this family as best I could, she said I needed to find a way to separate our personal life from this family’s ordeal, so that I could maintain my personal well-being, focus on my own family, and recognize how fortunate we were to have a healthy family of our own,” he says.

Despite the personal sacrifices involved, many attorneys strive to balance the intense demands of their profession with their family lives—a challenge that Lever knows all too well.

Lever made a commitment to himself and his family, devoting his home time to being present.

“If I was unable to do this, then I would need to decide if being a lawyer was worth it,” he says.

Compounding the trauma

It’s not just a single case that strains most lawyers, however. As Emily Lewis, a criminal justice program managing attorney with the Animal Legal Defense Fund in Portland, Oregon, explains, the accumulation of trauma across multiple cases can be especially damaging.

“It is layering of the secondary trauma from each individual case that has the biggest potential to negatively impact my mental health on a day-to-day basis,” Lewis says.

Not surprisingly, a nationwide study of 13,000 lawyers in 2023 found that 28% experienced depression, 19% reported anxiety, 21% had alcohol use problems, and 11% had problems with drug use.

Mercedes Diego, a partner with Cohn Lifland Pearlman Herrmann & Knopf in New Jersey, says she turned to family and colleagues in her law firm after dealing with an especially difficult case in the early 2000s.

Diego was preparing to start a family when she was defending a father whose parental rights were ultimately terminated because of drug addiction.

“Considering the strong ties between my parents and me, it was difficult for me to fathom that this father didn’t move heaven to do whatever was necessary to not lose his parental rights,” Diego says.

While talking about the case with a support system helped Diego, she says she ultimately shifted her practice, choosing less emotionally taxing cases.

“There’s something to be said for shifting your area of practice to one that doesn’t keep you up at night, conflicted between your obligation to your client and thinking about the other side,” Diego says. “I am much happier these days practicing commercial litigation and representing businesses in disputes.”

How to traverse the trauma

But even this type of work is stressful and can be emotionally draining.

Erin Gleason Alvarez, an arbitrator, a mediator and a negotiation consultant and the founder of Gleason Alvarez ADR in New York City, says she makes a plan to address the emotions that arise from her cases. Most of the time, that plan involves a deep breathing and meditation practice to help her handle the angry, frustrated, anxious and often-unhappy people who are seeking her help.

However, not all attorneys find respite in routines such as meditation. For Georgia lawyer M. Jared Easter, balancing his emotional well-being required physical outlets, as well. Easter decided to be an attorney because he is passionate about helping those in need.

But nothing could have prepared him for the emotional toll that these needs took on his mental health. In 2022, in Acworth, Georgia, a man was struck by a car while he was walking on a sidewalk. It was a minor impact, but the man fell backward and hit his head, resulting in a traumatic brain injury, Easter says. The man couldn’t remember his wife or his children, and he was unable to care for himself. Less than two years later, the man died.

“We had surveillance video of the incident, and it was so heartbreaking to see a man with so much pep in his step and a huge smile lose so much in an instant,” says Easter, a partner at Williams Elleby Howard & Easter in Georgia.

It took a lot of exercising and music making to clear his brain. He also extols the virtue of therapy.

“Therapy can be such a positive experience for attorneys struggling in our profession,” he says. “Sometimes I think people view therapy is something for weak people. But it’s just the opposite. It takes a strong person to be willing to look inward to help themselves.”

###

Coffey Modica adds three attorneys to its insurance litigation team

December 16, 2024

The Westport-based law firm Coffey Modica LLP has recently added three litigators to its team of insurance litigation experts. Two are from Fairfield County and a third from Westchester County.

Coffey Modica, with six offices including their brand-new headquarters in Westport, recently hired Partner Megan Bryson of Fairfield, Partner Evan Echenthal of Chappaqua, New York, and Counsel Julia London of Ridgefield. The firm serves clients in Connecticut, New York, and New Jersey.

Bryson, who works in the firm’s Westport headquarters, has more than 15 years of experience in complex litigation and insurance defense. With bar admissions in Connecticut and New York and multiple federal courts, Bryson brings experience in professional liability, employment law, commercial litigation, and aviation matters.

Echenthal, who works out of the firm’s Tarrytown office, has more than two decades of experience, specializing in construction and vehicle accidents, liability, and property damage.

London, who served as an assistant district attorney at the New York County District Attorney’s office, has provided her expertise on a variety of cases including violent crimes, identity theft, and sexual assault. She works in the firm’s Tarrytown office.

With more than 15 years of experience in prosecution and defense, she specializes in medical malpractice defense, negligence claims, and general and products liability litigation, focusing on healthcare providers, hospitals, and nursing homes.

For more than 30 years, the partners at Coffey Modica have represented the country’s most prominent businesses and insurance companies and have built remarkable reputations and practices by delivering optimal resolutions unique to each client and matter. Its practice areas are focused on liability claims, excess property and casualty, medical malpractice, and nursing.

Hit with a subpoena? Court order? Know the difference, respond accordingly

Joelle Duval and Patricia Mooney provide their insights

Part B News / partbnews.com
Volume 38, Issue 10
March 4, 2024

By: Roy Edroso

When a criminal or civil case embroils a practice, subpoenas or court orders requesting or demanding records may come to the front desk. You may face different types of requests that can be made in connection with the case in question, and it’s vital that your staff understand the difference.

The documentation requests sometimes lead to legal cases against providers, as with a case presently before the Maine District Court concerning Meredith Norris, D.O., who has been indicted on alleged violations of the Controlled Substances Act based in part on documents obtained in an FBI search. Norris has challenged some of the document seizures on which the case against her is based.

Records are often protected by laws such as HIPAA, but that protection may not count in all circumstances. Misunderstandings about this have led to some costly errors. Consider a case adjudicated by the Connecticut Supreme Court in Byrne v. Avery Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology (PBN 1/28/19). In that case, an OB/GYN practice had surrendered patient records in response to a subpoena, apparently believing they had no choice. That turned out to be false, and cost the practice heavily in a suit brought by the patient whose protected health information (PHI) was surrendered.

Broadly speaking, PHI is protected by federal and, in some cases, state privacy laws against civil demands, though it may be surrendered in criminal matters. But it’s important to understand the details.

Civil subpoenas: Easier

“Subpoenas can come from many sources,” explains Alex J. Keoskey, a partner with Mandelbaum Barrett PC in Roseland, N.J. “They can be issued by plaintiff attorneys handling civil claims such as personal injury or malpractice lawsuits, other counsel handling divorce actions, government law enforcement and regulatory agencies, criminal prosecutors, state licensing authorities or state and federal government agencies which prosecute insurance fraud, misconduct or gross malpractice.”

John C. Eason of Bass, Berry & Sims PLC in Nashville names the types of documents you’re likely to see: a grand jury subpoena (criminal investigation), a civil investigative demand (civil investigation), an administrative investigative

demand (criminal investigation), and an administrative subpoena (likely an administrative or civil investigation, but could be part of a criminal investigation). These should be identifiable on their face.

Generally speaking, subpoenas that come from a lawyer in a civil case do not require an immediate remand, and state and federal HIPAA laws will guide your response with regard to medical records. That is, you cannot give out PHI without the patient’s permission.

Often these subpoenas with be accompanied by a HIPAA authorization signed by the patient that the attorney has already obtained, says Paul D. Werner of the Buttaci, Leardi & Werner law firm in Princeton, N.J.

“With your standard civil-court subpoena, nine times out of 10, you’re getting served via mail or a delivery service, as opposed to somebody walking in and physically handing it to you,” Werner says. But however it comes, the authorization has to be cleared with the patient for HIPAA compliance. Once it is, in most cases you should comply with the request.

When the judge asks, comply

Orders from a judge or magistrate usually require a different response. If you find a judge’s name and signature on the bottom of the subpoena, chances are HIPAA is no longer operable. Note, however, that’s not an ironclad rule; there can be exceptions.

Court orders are not only for criminal proceedings, says Joelle Duval, counsel with Coffey Modica LLP in White Plains, N.Y. “Even in your ordinary slip-and-fall case, you can have a judge order a subpoena directing Doctor Smith’s practice to send medical records for the plaintiff to the courthouse,” she notes.

Failure to comply timely can be considered contempt of court with a monetary fine. Usually, it’s a modest $50 fine, says Patricia A. Mooney, a partner at Coffey Modica, though “obviously you want to be compliant with the court.”

Search warrant: Must do

Take note of one thing that’s an immediate-action scenario: A search warrant in a criminal investigation. “In that instance, you’ve got zero control over the situation,” Werner says.

The first thing staff should do when agents present a warrant is to obtain a copy and get your lawyer on the phone, Werner says. But forget about blocking the agents from doing what the warrant says they can do. “Usually, when federal officers like FBI or IRS agents come in, they will sort of segregate out the staff that’s in the office, and start cataloguing and taking what they need to take,” Werner says.

“The agents can prevent you from leaving while they conduct the search, or they can require you to leave the physical premises but remain in the general area until they’ve completed it,” Werner adds. “They can temporarily take your pocketbooks, backpacks, cell phones, things like that, and keep them away from you while they conduct their search. Eventually they’ll give you or your lawyer an inventory of what they took and leave.”

During the search, agents can prohibit staff from talking to one another and from talking to other people on the phone about the search. But, Werner says, “they can’t prevent you from contacting your lawyer to advise on the subpoena or search warrant. In fact, more often than not, they’ll get on the phone with a lawyer and provide copies of the search warrant.”

And they can’t prohibit you from discussing the raid after they leave. Neither can the agents compel you to talk to them based on the warrant. But note: Your practice “can’t compel your employees to not talk to the agents, either,” Werner says.

Another must: CMS calling

There’s another situation in which practices can’t stonewall: Medicare investigations, such as when CMS contractors come around to confirm that you’re a real practice “because there’s been a lot of fraud over the years where providers

put up an address purporting to be their business address, and Medicare comes out to check and it’s a post office box or a nail salon, or doesn’t exist at all,” Werner says.

Generally these officials identify themselves and show a document which you may read “but which they will not permit you to keep or make a copy of,” Werner says.

You should immediately get your lawyer on the phone for this. “We’ve had a lot of those phone calls where I’m on speakerphone with the office manager and talking to the Medicare contractor about the scope of what they’re doing,” Werner says. You may even get the contractor to wait to do their look-around until the practice is less busy.

Exceptions for ‘sensitive’ records

Not all orders signed by judges — even in criminal investigations — require or even allow immediate delivery of requested patient information in all cases.

Meredith Norris has challenged some of the document seizures on which the case against her is based. In one instance, she has contested admission of documents obtained with a subpoena that was served to a “federally regulated substance abuse treatment facility” with which she is associated, on grounds that such a request “requires a valid court Order authorizing disclosure pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ¤290dd-2 and the federal regulations implementing the same.” That subpoena has since been withdrawn.

Werner notes that if a patient is in treatment for a substance use disorder (SUD), the confidentiality of their records is covered by federal law — specifically, 42 CFR Part Two, “Confidentiality of Substance Use Disorder Patient Records” — and there are a number of added steps lawyers and even government and law enforcement officials must complete before the order may be obeyed (see resources, below).

“If we assume, for the sake of this discussion, that the cops aren’t there looking for the records of the person they’re going after, then they can’t get those records at all,” Werner says. “If they’re looking to investigate somebody other than the person they’re after, they can’t have the records even if the person whose records they’re seeking signs [standard HIPAA] paperwork consenting to it — unless they have also signed very specific paperwork that contains very specific language that complies with Part Two, which is clear on what exactly what has to be contained within that document. Absent that, they can’t comply if they don’t have consent.”

In fact, Werner says, even if records are those of a fugitive or someone else the authorities are empowered to apprehend, you might not be able to turn them over under Part Two, because it “has particular sections governing the use of SUD records in the context of criminal investigations, and generally speaking those records cannot be used for purposes of investigation or prosecution barring exceptional circumstances.”

Also note: Some state privacy and HIPAA laws are stricter than federal HIPAA. As a rule of thumb, federal HIPAA prevails if there’s a conflict with state law, except “if the state has more stringent rules, in which case the practice can follow the state’s rule instead,” Duval explains.

And some states have especially tight laws regarding “sensitive” patient records. In New York State, requests for “anything about mental health, drug, alcohol use, opioid addiction [and] HIV status requires specific signed authorization from the patient,” Duval explains. The patient must check and initial Box 9(a) of the state authorization form before any of these sensitive records can be disclosed, and “this agreement for disclosure must be done individually for each category.”

Make the call

In all of the situations described above you’re advised to contact your legal counsel before doing anything. Fortunately, most such cases don’t require an immediate answer, even “when it’s Inspector General or FBI agents showing up at your office to serve that document,” Werner says.

One example Werner cites is a civil investigative demand, often seen in False Claims Act investigations. “Those are sometimes sent in the mail, but sometimes they’re served in person by agents,” Werner says. “In those instances, practices may get confused — understandably, because you’ve got guys with badges coming in. But even in those cases, they can be treated no differently than a subpoena — they’re just a request for documents and nothing else.”

Chances are your lawyer will talk to their lawyer, and work to revise the requirements so they’re less onerous. “That’s why subpoenas have extended return dates on them,” Werner says. “And we always get more time for subpoenas. In 17 years of practice, I don’t think I’ve ever responded to a subpoena by the return date originally identified on the subpoena.”

Subpoena via Twitter?

Reagan E. Boyce, partner at with the Chamblee Ryan firm in Dallas, says if your practice group is in Texas and has a social media presence, someone should check the account on a regular basis: “Texas now allows for the service of legal process such as subpoenas and citations through social media as a form of substitute service when the regular methods have failed,” she says.

In such cases, a court order is still required before social media sites can be used for service, Boyce says, but “if an order is obtained, service is proper via social media platforms and all related deadlines will begin to run once service is completed.”

Resource • Code of Federal Regulations, Title 42 Part Two, Confidentiality of Substance Use Disorder Patient Records: www.ecfr.gov/current/title-42/chapter-I/subchapter-A/part-2

https://pbn.decisionhealth.com/Articles/Detail.aspx?id=547441