• 212-827-4501

Partners At Coffey Modica Get To Be ‘The New Guy’ Together

Coffey Modica Partners, Michael D. Neri and Adam Greenberg, were featured in an article by Law360 on being the “new guys”.
By Elizabeth Daley | March 14, 2025

Business and insurance defense litigation firm Coffey Modica LLP has added two partners to its team in Tarrytown, New York, marking a homecoming of sorts for one, who worked as an associate under the firm’s founding partner, while allowing both veteran attorneys to simultaneously be “the new guy.”

Michael D. Neri, formerly of Pillinger Miller Tarallo LLP, told Law360 on Friday that he was looking forward to playing a mentorship role, similar to the one founding partner Michael W. Coffey played for him decades ago.

“I am looking to work with associates and mold them and help guide them in the right direction,” Neri said, remembering how Coffey taught him “how to think on your feet in court,” among other things.

During office renovations, Neri is sharing an office with fellow new recruit, Adam Greenberg, who is also a seasoned litigator with over 20 years of experience.

Greenberg, who hails from Harrington Ocko & Monk LLP, said he enjoyed having an office mate who was also sharing the experience of being the new guy.

“It’s nice to have somebody else who has also been doing this a long time. We bounce a lot of ideas off of each other,” said Greenberg, who graduated from Yeshiva University’s Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law after completing his undergraduate education at Tufts University, where he majored in English.

Greenberg said transitioning from English to studying the law seemed pretty logical to him.

“I think it’s kind of natural. A lot of the law involves communication and writing,” he said, noting that he also enjoys the excitement and competitive nature of litigation.

“There’s a lot of challenges facing defendants. We are living in a very political age, and a lot of people are against corporations, and it makes it an uphill battle, when you get these cases and have to explain it all to the jury,” Greenberg said.

Both Greenberg and Neri have handled a broad range of litigation in state and federal courts. Greenberg said that labor law and construction accidents might be his specialty, if he had to be specific. However, one of his most interesting cases involved representing a church that was accused of illegally keeping the human remains of an employee — showing that his experience really does run the gamut.

Neri touted his experience broadly defending insurance companies, but counts the rapper DMX as one of his most interesting clients, whom he could never get on the phone.

“They said he caused an automobile accident, and whenever I looked him up online, he was all over the world causing automobile accidents. So we had to hurry up and settle that one,” Neri said, reminiscing about defending the rapper.

When Neri, who graduated from Thomas M. Cooley Law School and the University of Houston, isn’t arguing in court, he said he has a good sparring partner in his wife. Gina Longobardi was also an insurance defense attorney at Black Marjieh & Sanford LLP.

He has never litigated against her due to conflicts of interest, he said, but if he were, Neri joked that he wouldn’t stand a chance.

“I am afraid of what she would do to me. I haven’t won a fight in a long time, and I am sure I wouldn’t win that one either,” he said.

Neri may have better luck, however, in the fantasy baseball league that he is trying to get started at the office.

“It’s a fun environment, we are having a really good time,” Neri said, noting he was glad to have joined the firm, which has six offices with over 40 attorneys spread across the Tristate area, according to its website.

###

Coffey Modica Taps International Business Leader to Serve as CFO

March 2, 2025

Leading insurance defense litigation firm Coffey Modica LLP has named Peter Gould, a veteran of the corporate and financial industry with more than two decades of experience working with billion-dollar national and international firms, as the law firm’s new Chief Financial Officer.

One of the fastest growing law firms in the United States, Coffey Modica has undergone a substantial organic expansion since its founding in 2021, approaching 100 staff members and six offices across three states in just under four years.

In his new role, Gould hopes to tap into his extensive experience in financial and general management, strategic planning, mergers and acquisitions, organizational development and growth to further scale up firm operations and reach.

“I have known Michael Coffey for a long time, and I believe in his vision for what a more effective legal services firm can and should be for both clients and top litigators,” said Gould. “I am proud to be part of that mission, and I look forward to working with the Coffey Modica team to achieve substantial, strategic growth across the country and around the world.”

Over the course of his career, Gould, a British Charted Management Accountant, has propelled corporate development and growth at billion-dollar companies through a combination of merger, acquisition and roll up strategies, as well as via organic growth. He previously served as President of the North America Flavor Division for 150-year-old French flavor and fragrance company Mane, as well as Vice President General Manager and CFO of the International Flavor Division at Sensient. At both companies, he sourced, negotiated and closed multiple new business line acquisitions across the U.K., France, Italy, Spain, Hong Kong, Japan, New Zealand, Mexico and the U.S.

Most recently, Gould served as President and founder of Stamford Capital LLC, which successfully provided advisory services focused primarily on assisting middle market companies with revenues of $10 million to $400 million plus in a range of industries throughout North America, Asia and Europe. In this role, Gould focused on Food Ingredients, Aerospace (Manufacturing and Services), Highly Engineered Manufacturing, Distribution and Services Industries.

“Peter Gould is an exceptional financial leader whose expertise and business acumen spans industries and continents alike. He is adept at identifying, managing and achieving a company’s KPIs and I have no doubt that together with Peter’s guidance, Coffey Modica will achieve greater market presence and an even larger platform to deliver its unique style of strategic legal counsel for insurers and the companies and business leaders they insure,” said Founding Partner Michael Coffey.

Coffey Modica LLP has offices in New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut and is one of the fastest-growing litigation defense firms in the nation. The firm specializes in defense litigation for insurance companies and businesses and leaders they insure, in a wide variety of fields including automobile, construction, healthcare, real estate and more.

###

AI, ESG Amid Biggest Worries Keeping GCs Up At Night

Coffey Modica partner, Michael Mezzacappa, was quoted in Law360, highlighting rapidly rising legal costs driven by a growing number nuclear verdicts.
By Sue Reisinger | January 2, 2025

The year 2025 has arrived for general counsel like a scary movie featuring monster environmental, social and governance risks, new technology demons that threaten to rip apart data privacy and security, and overlords who demand the legal department defend the company and save the day

In other words, it’s a new year, and general counsel are expected to be ready for anything. Law360 Pulse recently talked with some legal leaders about what’s keeping general counsel up at night in 2025.

The Conference Board, a nonprofit group that provides business research and advice, recently listed several risky issues for which executives need to “future proof” their companies. The issues included diversity, equity and inclusion policies; taking a political stance in public; and dealing with climate change, especially related to disinformation and misinformation.

On diversity, for example, the board warned that in 2025, DEI leaders “should prepare for a potential escalation in anti-DEI rhetoric, accelerated backlash, and additional DEI-related legislative and policy changes.” It advised general counsel and other corporate leaders to ensure clear messaging to employees and stakeholders, conduct a comprehensive review of their DEI programs and strategies, and be ready to adjust.

A different key concern arose for Ashton Yarnall, a lawyer who directs program development for executive event planner Consero, when she recently networked with legal leaders at a Consero general counsel forum. She found that artificial intelligence is top of mind for them in 2025.

“General counsel are particularly focused on establishing robust frameworks for AI governance, ensuring compliance with emerging AI regulations, and strengthening cybersecurity measures across their organizations,” Yarnall said. “The intersection of these issues — managing AI development while protecting sensitive data and maintaining cybersecurity — represents a complex challenge that requires GCs to balance innovation with risk management and regulatory compliance.”
Another hot issue, Yarnall said, was how the general counsel position continues to evolve, combining legal advocacy with the role of business adviser.

Legal leaders are searching for how to “seamlessly integrate legal considerations into business strategy while maintaining their professional independence and ethical obligations,” she explained.

Individual general counsel who talked with Law360 Pulse often raised issues more particular to their own businesses. For instance, Brian Dunn, the top lawyer at CrashPlan, a cloud-based computer backup service, said general counsel should worry about new regulations governing technology.

Dunn cited the European Union’s Digital Operational Resilience Act as a regulation “that could have significant implications” for U.S. financial institutions and data and digital service providers that serve EU customers or handle data linked to EU financial markets. The act establishes standards for managing and recovering from cyber incidents, system failures and operational disruptions.

“Failure to comply can result in fines, reputational damage, and loss of contracts with EU clients,” Dunn said. Fines can reach as high as 2% of a company’s annual global revenue, or more than $1 million for an individual within an organization.

Likewise, Klinton Miyao, general counsel at Human Interest Inc., focused on the issue closest to his business: retirement plan worries. Human Interest, based in San Francisco, provides full-service retirement plans like 401(k) plans to employers.

“Many of my fellow GCs, [chief legal officers] and small-to-medium-sized business owners are unaware of the compliance risk and cost center that their retirement plan presents to their organization,” Miyao said, citing new regulatory obligations and increased employee suits over excessive fees.

Michelle Reed, an outside counsel who often works with in-house legal teams, agreed with Yarnall, Dunn and others in seeing technology at the center of most general counsel’s nightmares. Reed, a Paul Hastings partner and co-chair of the data privacy and cybersecurity group, said their biggest worry lies in “the big game hunting data breaches that we have seen roll out in the last two years [featuring] threat actors sneaking in and pulling data out bit by bit, or those threat actors that are shutting down companies.”

Data breaches create “a huge stress for general counsel because there’s almost no way to prepare or prevent it,” she added.

One way legal teams can prepare, however, is to ensure “your incident response is top-notch and that you’re prepared because you have so many different rules now that govern cybersecurity and reporting requirements,” Reed said.

That means general counsel are often working to bring their companies back online safely while simultaneously figuring out how to respond to regulators, adding to the stress.

A second area of concern for legal leaders in 2025, Reed said, is the intersection of AI and privacy. “AI presents an incredible opportunity and companies are seizing on it,” she said, “but it also presents significant risks — privacy, cybersecurity, discrimination. When you plug in all of those risks, general counsel are struggling to figure out what is the proper governance.”

A third area worrying general counsel, according to Reed, is regulatory enforcement by state attorneys general, which she is seeing especially in the privacy and cybersecurity space.

In the past, she noted, big states like California and New York have been the most active enforcers. “But the landscape is changing significantly and very quickly,” Reed said. “Over the past year, we’ve seen Texas and Utah, for example, more than double the size of their enforcement staff at the attorney general level, focusing on privacy and cybersecurity. And we’ve seen a significant uptick in both investigations and enforcement.”

Reed predicted that more states will roll out such regulations in 2025 and companies should prepare to “face enforcement in a myriad of jurisdictions.”

Another outside counsel, Peter Lando, founding partner at Lando & Anastasi LLP in Boston, focuses on patent and related areas of the law. He said general counsel are concerned with keeping up with changing legislation and rules in administrative agencies.

For instance, Lando said, he met with clients in 2024 who were worried over the Federal Trade Commission’s proposed noncompete ban. The FTC backed off the ban, “but it’s certainly emboldened many states to put their own versions in place” for 2025, he said.

Arash Behravesh, a Lando client, is senior intellectual property counsel at Agilent Technologies, which is based in Santa Clara, California. Behravesh, who works remotely from Washington, D.C., spoke from his personal viewpoint and not on behalf of Agilent.

He said his first area of concern for 2025 — “and I think this is general for all corporations” — is budget restraints and the need for reduced spending.” This is especially true, he said, when trying to balance IP protection with cost pressures to reduce spending.

The next biggest in-house challenge at all companies, Behravesh said, is balancing a growing legal workload with limited resources.

“Most companies are trying to cut costs, and the easiest way to do that is to not hire [or replace] employees, which means more work for everybody else,” he explained.

A third area of concern for Behravesh involves mergers and acquisitions. “We try to acquire on average at least one growing company per year,” he said. “So one of the things that keeps me up at night is due diligence,” especially pertaining to troublesome IP portfolios that could end up in litigation.

And no general counsel nightmare story would be complete without a mention of rising legal fees. Axiom CEO David McVeigh recently said in a statement accompanying a research report on budgeting, “Beyond the research, clients consistently tell me they are at the end of their rope on law firm costs and annual rate increases.”

Michael P. Mezzacappa, now a partner and general counsel at insurance defense firm Coffey Modica LLP in Tarrytown, New York, has his own take on the problem. Previously he served five years as a named in-house counsel at Frontier Insurance Co. while working at the law firm Slevin Sold Neubardt Weissman Faillace Samberg & Mezzacappa.

“Corporations are always concerned with legal fees, right?” Mezzacappa asked. Unlike most general counsel, however, who tend to blame law firms for raising their rates every year, he blames the plaintiffs bar and higher verdict awards, especially against wealthy corporations.

“And to go to trial is just much more costly than it was 10 years ago,” he said. “I’m talking about exponentially more costly.”

Mezzacappa rages about plaintiffs attorneys who support unnecessary surgeries and extend workers’ compensation cases beyond what’s fair, along with judges with crowded dockets who rush cases and juries too eager to sock it to corporations, especially insurance companies.

“The plaintiffs bar is getting increasingly richer because the verdict values have gone up exponentially,” he said. “So that’s the biggest concern in my general counsel, defense attorney world.”

###

Michael Coffey: Building success in litigation and community leadership

Discover insights from Michael Coffey, founding partner of Coffey Modica LLP, in Crain’s latest Quick Take. Coffey shares his journey building one of the nation’s fastest-growing insurance defense firms during the pandemic, his success in high-stakes litigation, and his dedication to community service. Learn how he leveraged innovative strategies, handled cases worth up to $250 million, and applied lessons from leadership roles in government and nonprofit work. Don’t miss this compelling conversation about resilience, growth, and giving back. Click to watch the full interview.

Coffey Modica adds three attorneys to its insurance litigation team

December 16, 2024

The Westport-based law firm Coffey Modica LLP has recently added three litigators to its team of insurance litigation experts. Two are from Fairfield County and a third from Westchester County.

Coffey Modica, with six offices including their brand-new headquarters in Westport, recently hired Partner Megan Bryson of Fairfield, Partner Evan Echenthal of Chappaqua, New York, and Counsel Julia London of Ridgefield. The firm serves clients in Connecticut, New York, and New Jersey.

Bryson, who works in the firm’s Westport headquarters, has more than 15 years of experience in complex litigation and insurance defense. With bar admissions in Connecticut and New York and multiple federal courts, Bryson brings experience in professional liability, employment law, commercial litigation, and aviation matters.

Echenthal, who works out of the firm’s Tarrytown office, has more than two decades of experience, specializing in construction and vehicle accidents, liability, and property damage.

London, who served as an assistant district attorney at the New York County District Attorney’s office, has provided her expertise on a variety of cases including violent crimes, identity theft, and sexual assault. She works in the firm’s Tarrytown office.

With more than 15 years of experience in prosecution and defense, she specializes in medical malpractice defense, negligence claims, and general and products liability litigation, focusing on healthcare providers, hospitals, and nursing homes.

For more than 30 years, the partners at Coffey Modica have represented the country’s most prominent businesses and insurance companies and have built remarkable reputations and practices by delivering optimal resolutions unique to each client and matter. Its practice areas are focused on liability claims, excess property and casualty, medical malpractice, and nursing.

Law Firm Moves Into Historic Westport Building

Coffey Modica LLP, a national defense litigation firm, recently moved to 65 Jesup Road in Westport.
December 11, 2024

Coffey Modica LLP, a national defense litigation firm representing prominent business and insurance companies in liability claims, excess property/casualty, medical malpractice, nursing, and other professional industries, has opened a new office in Westport that will serve as the firm’s Connecticut headquarters.

Located at 65 Jessup Road, the 4,000-square-foot building sits in the heart of Westport’s Jessup Road Historic District, within walking distance of the vibrant downtown, including The Westport Library, Westport Police Department, and the historic Jesup Green. Near Imperial Avenue, it has come to be known as the “Godillot Carriage House.”

Building features include a brick-paved front patio and two porches, including one that faces Dead Men’s Brook, which runs through the side of the property.

The new offices are designed to accommodate 16 attorneys and staff.

“This historic building is truly located in the heart of downtown Westport. As many of our partners and clients have deep, entrenched roots in Fairfield County, establishing Coffey Modica’s Connecticut headquarters in a venue so central to the city of Westport was a priority for us,” said Founding Partner Michael Coffey.

Built in 1882, 65 Jessup Road was listed on the National Register of Historic Places by the U.S. Department of the Interior in 1977. The structure is considered the best example of Stick style architecture in Westport.

Revolutionary Links to Westport’s Founding

The land where 65 Jessup Road now sits belonged to the family of local Revolutionary War surgeon Dr. Ebenezer Jesup and his son Major Ebenezer Jesup, a prominent local grain trader. Members of the influential family date back more than 300 years in the community and were instrumental in changing the town’s name from Saugatuck to Westport.

Among prominent descendants was Morris Ketchum Jesup, an American banker and philanthropist who was president of the American Museum of Natural History, the YMCA New York, and was knighted by Russian Tsar Nicholas II. He was a major underwriter of early expeditions to explore the Artic, Alaska, Siberia, and Greenland, and had a hand in creating New York State’s Adirondack Park, while helping the Tuskegee Institute and George Washington Carver bring mobile classrooms to poor farming communities. In 1884 he donated his mansion as the parsonage for the Saugatuck Congregational Church and endowed what is today the Westport Public Library.
65 Jessup Road was later owned by Julia Godillot, the daughter of a Westport grocery merchant and the wife of a French importer, before being sold and converted in the 1920s. Other subsequent tenants include the Town of Westport Board of Education.

Law Firm Partners with Deep Local Roots

Coffey Modica Founding Partner Michael Coffey formerly served as President of the Norwalk City Council from 2005 to 2007, and Norwalk Fire Commissioner from 2007 to 2013, as well as Zoning Commissioner for the City of Norwalk from 2014 to 2016. He served for six years (2007 to 2012) as Senator Lieberman’s appointee to the U.S. Military Academy Selection Committee for Annapolis, West Point, and the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy. Coffey was among only four Connecticut elected officials who endorsed the sitting senator after he changed parties and ran in 2006 for reelection and won as an Independent.

After leading the East Coast operations of a California-based litigation firm, in 2021 he formed Coffey Modica, a firm that in less than 30 months has already expanded to employ more than 70 attorneys and staff across six offices on the East Coast. It is one of the fastest-growing legal practices in the nation, with success attributed not only to its commitment to quality and values, but to leveraging modern efficiencies allowing their lawyers to spend more time in practice and litigating, and less time mired in bureaucratic red tape and paperwork.

The firm’s client roster includes 12 of the 20 largest global insurance companies, entrusting its attorneys with cases far in excess of $10,000,000. Handling complex litigations and parachuting into trials across the country has helped the firm manage countless intricate legal challenges.

Mr. Coffey holds the esteemed designation of an ABOTA (American Board of Trial Advocates) trial attorney, a selective credential placing him among the most outstanding trial attorneys in the U.S.

Coffey Modica LLP represents defendants in high-profile, high-exposure matters across many disciplines and industries around the country. Known for being aggressive trial attorneys and litigators, Coffey Modica resolves matters on behalf of its clients with the most cost-effective resolutions aligned with their short- and long-term business goals and culture.

The Trump administration and its impact on social inflation

As the insurance landscape braces for shifts under the upcoming Trump administration, Michael Coffey, founding partner of Coffey Modica LLP, shares expert analysis on what lies ahead. From evolving regulatory policies to the growing effects of social inflation, Coffey unpacks the challenges and opportunities that insurers, risk managers, and legal professionals must navigate in 2025 and beyond.

Hurricane Milton’s destruction

Coffey Modica founding partner, Michael Coffey, was featured in The Real Deal, offering expert insight on the recent crane collapse in St. Petersburg caused by Hurricane Milton.
Oct 10, 2024 | By Lidia Dinkova and Katherine Kallergis

In the wake of Hurricane Milton, developers and contractors in the Tampa Bay area are evaluating damage at project sites, calling insurers and preparing to resume construction work.

Milton made landfall as a Category 3 storm with winds of 120 miles per hour on Wednesday night in Siesta Key in Sarasota County, flooding streets and homes, and spawning tornadoes as far away as western Palm Beach County. More than 3 million homes and businesses lost power. At least 12 people are confirmed dead.

The storm came nearly two weeks after Category 4 Hurricane Helene, which hit Florida’s Big Bend. But as Milton took aim at the Gulf Coast and then crossed the state, it plowed through a much more developed and populated region. Early predictions estimated losses of up to $175 billion in the Tampa Bay area due to Milton.

In St. Petersburg, where winds reached over 100 miles per hour, a crane at the construction site of developer John Catsimatidis’ luxury Residences at 400 Central condo tower partially collapsed and slammed into the office building across the street, leaving a hole in its side and bricks scattered. The offices at 490 First Avenue South house the Tampa Bay Times newspaper and other businesses.

“The good news is that the only thing that was hurt was a few bricks. No human beings were hurt,” said Catsimatidis, founder of New York-based Red Apple Group.

The 46-story, 301-unit condo tower will be the tallest building in St. Petersburg at 515 feet. It has three construction cranes reportedly rated to withstand winds of up to 110 mph.

The cranes were “fully secured,” Catsimatidis said, adding that work will resume with the two remaining cranes. “Bottom line is let the insurance companies sort it out. It’s going to be the insurance company for whoever put the crane up there.”

Attorney Michael Coffey, who has worked on construction crane accident cases, said the St. Petersburg collapse likely will prompt investigations by federal, state and local authorities. Among the inquiries will be whether the site should have used cranes made to withstand more than 110 mph winds.

“One of the questions would be who made the call that that level sufficed. Was that an appropriate crane to have been up on one of the largest construction sites in western Florida in the middle of hurricane season?” said Coffey of New York-based Coffey Modica.

Development has boomed in the Tampa Bay region in recent years. In addition to Catsimatidis’ luxury condo tower, South Florida developers Related Group and Mast Capital are active along Florida’s west coast.

Miami-based Related assessed impacts from Milton in the greater Tampa Bay area on Thursday. Related’s founder, billionaire Jorge Pérez, said this summer that he plans to spend upwards of $3 billion on projects in the Tampa area.

“Fortunately, early reports show very limited damage across projects like The Ritz-Carlton Residences, Rome Yards, and West River,” a Related spokesperson said.

Related, led by Pérez and his sons Jon Paul and Nick, broke ground on the second tower at the planned Ritz-Carlton Residences in November. The construction site at 3101 Bayshore Boulevard overlooks Hillsborough Bay.

Rome Yards and West River are both mixed-income housing developments in west Tampa.

Even if damage on project sites is minimal, developers and general contractors have a lot of work to do, said Oscar Seikaly, CEO of Miami-based NSI Insurance Group. Damage at construction sites usually is from water intrusion, which could lead to mold and mildew.

Contractors and developers have to document the issue, as well as document that it was fixed and the precautions they will take to avoid the same problem in the future.

“There’s a lot of mitigation that has to be done even if you have a small water claim,” Seikaly said. Otherwise, those water issues could cause bigger problems for buyers of those units down the line.

Also in St. Petersburg, Hurricane Milton tore through Tropicana Field Stadium’s fiberglass roof. The Tampa Bay Rays, a Major League Baseball franchise, previously announced plans to replace Tropicana Field with a new stadium as part of a larger mixed-use development. Tropicana was reportedly built to withstand winds of up to 115 miles per hour.

Though South Florida was largely spared from Milton, parts of the tri-county region suffered tornadoes. Video footage shows damage from a tornado in Avenir, a new master-planned community southeast of Lake Okeechobee, as well as a tornado that touched down in Wellington. Damage was also spotted in south Miami-Dade County and western Broward County.

Just north of South Florida in St. Lucie County, a tornado outbreak killed at least six people in the senior housing community of Spanish Lakes Country Club near Fort Pierce, according to reports.

Milton came as Florida residential and commercial property owners have been reeling from skyrocketing insurance premiums. The state’s vulnerability to hurricanes and storm surge led some carriers to opt out of providing coverage in Florida, leading to less competition among insurers and ever-increasing premiums.

Seikaly, of NSI, said he does not expect Milton will necessarily further raise builders liability premiums, or those for flood and wind policies at construction sites. But in light of the partial crane collapse, insurance for crane operators could become more challenging in South Florida where only half a dozen insurers are willing to cover the risk. The tri-county region’s dense development makes real estate damage from a crane accident more likely.

“It will make insurance companies take a much tougher look when they are asked to quote a crane company,” Seikaly said. “A crane in Brickell, I would have sleepless nights because no matter how the crane moves, it would hit something.”

 

Uber win on lawsuit motion highlights major role of binding arbitration

Coffey Modica partner, Michael Mezzacappa, was quoted in Legal Drive, offering insight on arbitration.
Justin Bachman, Senior Reporter | October 3, 2024

Dive Brief:

  • A couple who suffered severe injuries riding with an Uber driver must take their complaint against the company to arbitration, having agreed to waive their jury trial right, a New Jersey appeals court ruled last month in a case that has drawn national media headlines. Binding arbitration clauses are common across countless consumer user and employment agreements governing products from mobile phones to tax-preparation software to cable TV service.
  • Georgia and John McGinty said their minor daughter had agreed to Uber’s “terms of use” in January 2022 while placing an Uber Eats order with her parents’ permission. Two months later, the couple were injured when their Uber driver failed to stop for a red light, according to the ruling. Uber says it has only one user agreement and that Georgia McGinty had agreed to its terms three separate times since her first use of the rideshare app in 2015.
  • “Despite assertions to the contrary, the court concluded that the plaintiff herself — not her teenage daughter — agreed to Uber’s Terms of Use, including the arbitration agreement, on multiple occasions,” Uber Technologies said Thursday in a statement. The company said its arbitration motion does not affect the plaintiffs’ claim against the driver, Jia Zheng, for whom Uber has a state-mandated $1.5 million auto liability policy, or “50 times more coverage than a typical driver is required to carry.”

Dive Insight:

Binding arbitration clauses have increased significantly in corporate user agreements and employment offer letters as companies seek to resolve disputes in a forum that offers less legal expense and quicker resolutions. Arbitration also helps defendants avoid class actions and the kind of nuclear verdicts jury trials can present.

The American Arbitration Association said in its annual report that it had more than 500,000 cases filed last year for the first time since the organization’s founding in 1926.

On Sept. 20, a three-judge panel of the New Jersey appeals court reversed a Superior Court ruling last year denying Uber’s motion to compel arbitration of the McGintys’ complaint.

The court found that Uber’s arbitration provision “clearly and unambiguously evidences a waiver of plaintiffs’ right to pursue any claims against Uber in a court of law and obligates plaintiffs to resolve their claims through binding arbitration.”

A person using Uber’s platform for a ride or restaurant delivery must agree to the user terms before they can proceed to a particular service. They must also be 18.

The couple intends to file a motion for reconsideration at the appeals court by Oct. 11, and, if the court declines, would then appeal to the New Jersey Supreme Court, one of their attorneys, Evan Lide of Stark & Stark PC, told Legal Dive Thursday in an email.

“This is not only about my clients’ plight, but this decision has a negative effect on millions of other consumers as well,” he wrote.

The Uber lawsuit is the second compelled arbitration case in three months to draw national media headlines.

In August, Walt Disney Parks and Resorts abandoned its motion to compel arbitration of a complaint filed by the husband of a New York doctor who died in October 2023 after she suffered an acute allergic reaction to nuts and dairy from a restaurant on a Disney property near Orlando, Florida.

Disney argued that the woman’s husband, Jeffrey Piccolo, had agreed in 2019 to arbitrate any disputes when he signed up for a Disney+ streaming video account. The company later dropped its motion, agreeing to let the case proceed in a court.

Walt Disney did not respond to a message from Legal Dive seeking comment on that litigation.

The company “strive(s) to put humanity above all other considerations,” Disney Experiences Chairman Josh D’Amaro said in an Aug. 20 statement to Ars Technica. “With such unique circumstances as the ones in this case, we believe this situation warrants a sensitive approach to expedite a resolution for the family who have experienced such a painful loss.”

In response to forced arbitration, many trial lawyers have filed arbitration demands in bulk, by the tens of thousands, hoping to provoke a defendant to settle, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and Mayer Brown attorneys argued in a 2023 white paper. Defendants typically bear the fee burden for arbitration proceedings.

When a firm files as many as 100,000 demands “does it really intend to resolve those claims on the merits?” attorneys Archis Parasharami, Andrew Pincus and Kevin Ranlett wrote. “Or is the goal to use the costs of instituting an arbitration — which are disproportionately borne by companies when consumers or employees initiate arbitration — to coerce a settlement without regard to the merits of the underlying claim?”

Corporations rely heavily on arbitration as a way to obtain “fair and reasonable” outcomes, said Michael Mezzacappa, a partner with Coffey Modica LLP.  Courts have become overly burdened, with litigation taking as much as five years in many states, he said.

“The jury verdicts the last 10 and 20 years are going nuclear,” said Mezzacappa, whose defense practice focuses on insurance cases. “An arbitrator is not going to sit there and give billions of dollars to somebody. Jurors are freely giving money away and it’s a problem for all of us.”

Consumers should also focus more attention on the agreements that they’re asked to sign in the course of their everyday lives, he said. “I think that society over time has learned to sign things without reading them.”

Georgia McGinty, an attorney who practices family law, believes that “consumers need to be protected,” Lide said.

“I am hopeful that the New Jersey Supreme Court is going to continue to protect the rights of consumers, but if we are unable to overturn the appellate decision, I think we need to look to a legislative fix,” he wrote. “Although the legislative fix may be too late for the McGintys, we want to do whatever we can to help other consumers in similar situations.”

Malpractice strategies

Coffey Modica associate, Veronica Mishkind, was quoted in Medical Economics Journal, offering insights on the common cause of malpractice suits.
By Keith Loria | October 1, 2024

Malpractice suits are something that doctors unfortunately need to be prepared for. After all, mistakes happen and sometimes patients don’t end up with the desired results, so in their minds, the doctor must be to blame.

But there are numerous safeguards physicians can engage to keep malpractice suits at bay.

Ari Gurian, founding partner of Gurian Law in Illinois whose practice represents victims of medical malpractice, notes that a plaintiff’s attorney in these lawsuits usually gets paid only if they win, so if they bring suit, most feel the case against a physician is pretty strong.

“Misdiagnosis, surgical errors, medication mistakes, lack of informed consent and improper documentation are the most common causes of malpractice claims we see,” she says. “I recommend health care professionals proactively address each of these areas of vulnerability on a continuous basis as their first defense against my firm or others.”

Danielle Kelvas, M.D., a primary care physician with The HCG Institute, says from her experience, the most effective strategies in guarding against malpractice suits are to spend more time with patients and really answer their questions, including being readily available for questions or issues later.

“Everyone just wants to feel heard, cared for and appreciated,” she says. “If you can do that, patients will like and respect you and you’ll have less disagreements. Of course, conflict is unavoidable. Even if the patient was in the wrong, I always thanked them for their feedback and reemphasized that my priority is their health and that I always had their best interest at heart.”

Veronica Mishkind, a registered nurse who is now an attorney in Coffey Modica’s medical malpractice and professional liability practices, notes that the most common cause of malpractice suits is a failure to diagnose or a delay in diagnosis.

“The risks associated with this can be catastrophic, so in order to mitigate those risks, PCPs (primary care providers) should conduct thorough head-to-toe examinations of their patients, refer patients to specialists or further tests for any complaints the patient may present,” she says. “The PCP should also refer the patient to blood panel screenings and other standard screenings such as mammograms.”

Importantly, all of this should be documented in the PCP’s chart, including the results of the head-to-toe physical examination.

Heather Warner, health care practice lead at Woodruff Sawyer, an insurance broker and consultant, notes that a lack of knowledge, fear and an inability or refusal to change their lifestyle are the most common reasons patients pursue medical malpractice lawsuits.

“Many patients don’t want to go to the doctor or face their injury or illness, and they are intimated by medical jargon and the disparate knowledge between them and their health care providers,” she says. “However, at the same time, many patients believe that doctors can fix anything with surgery or a pill without them having to actively participate in their health.

The best way to mitigate these risks is to be kind and empathetic, to put the patients at ease and to invest them in their recovery.”

Alex Foxman, M.D., F.A.C.P., medical director at the Beverly Hills Institute, says all physicians should keep their medical knowledge up to date and ensure that they are practicing within the scope of their expertise.

“Refer patients to specialists when necessary and do not hesitate to seek second opinions when faced with complex cases,” he says. “You should also conduct regular audits of your practice to identify potential areas of risk. This includes reviewing patient records, practice protocols and communication methods to ensure they meet the highest standards.”

Mistakes to avoid

Almost half of adults in the U.S. have taken at least one prescription drug in the past 30 days. And, according to the FDA, 1.5 million patients are harmed each year by preventable medication errors. That means that they either got the wrong drug, they got too much of the drug, they had allergic reactions or there was some harmful interaction with another drug they were taking.

“My advice here is to pay attention to your patients, find out what other drugs they are taking and communicate effectively about potential risks and dosage,” Gurian says. “Each one of these injuries is preventable.”

Then there are misdiagnoses, which happen most often because of inadequate patient assessment; errors in medical judgment; failure to consider all relevant information or alternative diagnoses; and communication breakdowns within a health care team.

“To avoid a misdiagnosis malpractice lawsuit, I recommend doctors keep these risk areas in mind with every patient,” Gurian says.

Communication matters

Proper patient communication is key in preventing malpractice claims. The challenge is that not all patients feel comfortable discussing their concerns and complaints, so the PCP won’t get the correct information to make a plan of care, including further evaluation.

Therefore, PCPs should practice building their patient’s trust and rapport long term with their patients and being direct and empathetic with patients about their health, their options and their prognosis without using complex medical terms is key.

“Physicians need to take the time to make sure the patients understand what’s going on and what their treatment options are in plain, simple language, and then provide them with written notes to take home that reiterate what was discussed during their visit,” Warner says. “Research has shown that patients often forget up to 80% of what was said to them during their medical visits, so being precise is important.”

Physicians can try to foster an open and communicative relationship by trying to remember personal patient details to bring up at visits and take time during their patient’s visit to ensure that all patient concerns are addressed, fully considered and answered.

Proper documentation

Comprehensive and accurate documentation is a health care professional’s best defense against malpractice claims.

“You’d be surprised how many health care professionals keep poor records, and it only makes my job easier to win cases against them,” Gurian says. “Keep records of patient assessments, diagnoses, treatment plans and follow-ups to reduce the risk of error, and stick to established documentation protocols for maintaining electronic health records.

In litigation, Warner shares that she repeatedly hears the familiar mantra: “If it wasn’t documented, it didn’t happen” from the plaintiffs’ bar, so the importance of detailed, accurate documentation cannot be overstated.

“Physicians should be consistent in their charting, provide necessary detail, document their communications with the patient and refrain from interpersonal commentary that could be perceived as judgmental or insensitive,” she says.

From the first visit, Mishkind recommends writing down everything and anything that was discussed both with and from the patient.

“Not only should results of the physical evaluation be documented, but so should what was discussed with the patient, along with next steps and future care plans,” she says. “Further, any materials provided to the patient, including medical articles and studies, referrals, etc., should also be noted in the chart.”

At the end of each documented visit, Kelvas always adds a few sentences about how she educated the patient about what would happen if they didn’t take their medication or follow our plan of action.

“If someone is nonadherent — the old term is ‘noncompliant’ — doesn’t get their regular blood work, doesn’t refill their meds on time so there’s a lapse in care, you have to document it, otherwise, you can get dinged for a failure to follow up,” she says.

For informed consent documents, things need to be detailed and complete and include only the risks/benefits of the specific treatment being provided. The written document must be written in plain language at a seventh-grade reading level or below, and the physician needs to schedule an appointment long enough to explain everything while leaving time for questions and clarification.

Information on any treatments should be provided to the patient in their fluent language and a copy of the same should also be documented in the chart and indicated as provided to the patient.

“An informed consent document should be executed by the patient prior to any treatment or procedure,” Mishkind says.

Dealing with difficult patients

Most physicians at one time or another have run into a difficult patient relationship or someone who screams a risk of potential litigation.

When encountering someone who they think could be a challenge, Warner says physicians should slow down, have a nurse or other health care provider in the room and document.

“Though there are rare patients out there who are looking for an opportunity to sue a physician, most patients are just upset about their health issues and scared of what might happen to them, which sometimes leads to lashing out at — and blaming — their health care providers,” she says. “Empathy and patience are essential in these situations, and the physician needs to remain calm and avoid getting emotional, annoyed or angry with the patient.”

Primary care physicians need to actively listen to their patients and demonstrate that they genuinely care about their well-being. If they foster a relationship of open communication without judgment or condescension from the beginning, the barriers to patient communication, such as fear and embarrassment, will be vastly reduced and the physicians will get a more complete and accurate picture of their patients’ issues and health, making treatment plan decisions easier and more informed. That will cut down on any threats of a malpractice suit.